Gen. von Klinkerhofen

Why do you even try? You'll just be blocked in the next few minutes. — MichaelLinnear 01:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Because I've been blocked unjustly. Gen. von Klinkerhofen 01:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

For the love of god, just start anew with a completely different account name. — MichaelLinnear 01:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

No. I want to be open and sincere. I know that Wikipedia's rules promote lying (as Essjay's case clearly shows), but I am not going to do this. Gen. von Klinkerhofen 01:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

You'll just get blocked again, you really should save your own time as well as everybody elses. — MichaelLinnear 02:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

BTW - why did you report me? Do you really believe that block of my first account is justified? Gen. von Klinkerhofen 02:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

It most certainly is. You are an internet troll, through and through, now. You have made no other edits other than to censor random pages that you feel are disgusting and then come back and bitch about that your original account was blocked for reasons you can't seem to understand, no matter how many times I've explained it to you. I even made a massive post on the original talk page, which is now unprotected, that you seem to completely forget about. If you have any constructive edits to do, then do it. But stop going back to the same pages and posting the same off topic rant.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

My rant is not off-topic.

Please, explain me one more time, what was the reason of your indefinite block. I see only one policy that I violated - 3RR on Ejaculation, removal of picture. This picture is controversial -- it is not included in the article anymore.

I didn't forget about anything, don't worry. I've replied to your post on my talk page of my first account. But now my talk page of my first account is fully protected again, unfortunately... Gen. von Klinkerhofen 02:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

It is because all you did was edit war. Whether or not you were involved with YTMND is irrelevant now. The fact that you keep coming back and disrupt is.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but you cannot justify your indefinite block with my actions AFTER this block.

One more time - your indefinite block was simply unjustified. Here is the timeline:

• 23:03, 20 February 2007 Gen. von Klinkerhoffen (Talk | contribs) New user account - creation of my first user account on English Wikipedia ever
• 05:35, 21 February 2007 Ryulong (Talk | contribs) blocked "Gen. von Klinkerhoffen (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (YTMND troll) - you've blocked me indefinitely
• my edits between 23:03, 20 February 2007 and 05:35, 21 February 2007 - I see only one violation of Wikipedia policies - WP:3RR violation on Ejaculation - removal of image; it seems that it was justified, because at this moment this image is not present in the article.

From WP:3RR: "If an editor violates the three-revert rule, they may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours, or longer in the case of a repeated violation." But it was not "repeated violation", it was my first time when I violated 3RR, so indefinite block was unfounded. Gen. von Klinkerhofen 02:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

Seriously. You should have listened to MichaelLinnear.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 02:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)