November 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Ugly Truth (film) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. NorwegianBlue talk 22:43, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Lucy Liu. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 23:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lucy Liu

edit

Saa19952, absolutely stop adding that crap image to this article, stop combining all the various filmography tables into one long contrived one, and absolutely stop making unhelpful edits. You messed up when you re-added the fake Salt poster to the film page that you originally uploaded as Saa19952. Slipped up there. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The image being used was taken in 2007, it's not that old, and it is quite quite well focused. The LucyLiu.jpg is dark, has very poor color and is grossly out of focus, plus it is older than the one being used. If you want to add awards to the already existing tables, that isn't an issue. The issue is that when you combined everything together into one table, you lost the distinction of the differing jobs she has filled in productions, which, if you would note, is precisely what is done on Sean Penn. Don't combine those filmography tables back. It is apparent that English isn't your first language, and I'm sorry, but I don't understand all your points. It also poses problems in the article text you've edited. It isn't helpful because the English grammar is not improved, it uses the wrong pronouns and the career section is not nearly long enough to be broken up into small sections. Right now, I'd be concentrating on trying to defend myself at the sock puppet accusation page because it is obvious to me that you and Saa19952 are the same person and will likely be blocked unless you can prove you are not that person. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lucy Liu. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sock puppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 04:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC))Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.