MonG695
Welcome
editWelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
March 2019
editWelcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Unite the Right rally, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 12:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- MrX 🖋 12:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
The following discretionary sanctions apply to all people who edit Unite the Right rally:
- You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to the article.
- You must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article
April 2020
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Traditionalist Catholicism, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 09:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)