Gavinwims
April 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gavin Wims, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gavin Wims was changed by Gavinwims (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-14T14:37:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
My talk page
editThere was no need for that change to my talk page, any edits made on wikipedia are licensed under the GDFL license. Your change has been reverted. Mww113 (talk) (Report a mistake!) 00:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, I would like to point out that your name is on my talk page because of my personal discussion with an administrator regarding the speeidly deletion of Gavin Wims (which later was speedily deleted). Please have a read of some policy before threatining indef blocks. The name in no way connects to you (as a user) or any of your user pages or user subpages, it is preserved as a dicussion with an administrator. If you continue to remove the dicussion from my talk page, it may be determined to be vandalism under WP:VAND. If you have a strong opposition as to why the dicussion should be removed please contact me, however as I see it there is no reason to revert my edit. Cheers! Mww113 (talk) (Report a mistake!) 13:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
The area on my talk page is a dicussion, not a refrence to you! It refers to a now deleted article. I can see no reason as to why it needs to be removed, I have over 500 edis without a single violation of core policy, and I am very expirenced with the privacy policy. There is no need to start a debate about such a petty little thing. The article was deleted, the section of my talk page is not a reference to you. I find it extreamly disturbing that all but one of your edits are to my talk page. This seems like sock puppetry to me. Mww113 (talk) (Report a mistake!) 16:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Sock Puppet
edit | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Jmccarthy96 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jmccarthy96 for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Mww113 (talk) (Report a mistake!) 19:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC) An administrator has determined this user not te be a sockpuppet, the case is now closed. Mww113 (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.