Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.drukpa.org/lineage/gdrukpa/01drukpa.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EivindJ (talk) 20:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kunga Paljor

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kunga Paljor, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.incense-man.co.uk/paljor.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jamyang Chodrak

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jamyang Chodrak, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.drukpa.org/lineage/gdrukpa/03drukpa.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate pages

edit

Please do not continue to create inappropriate pages on wikipedia. We take copyright very seriously. If you continue, you will be sanctioned. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 21:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Struck through warning, editor appears to be working in good faith. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.drukpa.org/lineage/gdrukpa/01drukpa.htm. As a copyright violation, Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Tsangpa Gyare Yeshe Dorje has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. — The Final Chronicler (talk) 21:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

If you are indeed the creator of the material you have added to Wikipedia, please replace the copyright notice on your website with a declaration that the contents are GFDL-licensed. (If you submit the content to Wikipedia under the GFDL license, it will be useable by third parties as well, and they will be permitted to modify the text and to use it commercially. See the text of the license.) Alternately, you can e-mail the permission to use the text under the GFDL license to Wikipedia; see this page for details. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Greetings!

edit

Yes, the article fits our format better. I would add just a slight qualifier to the birth/childhood stories - "The story says" or some such. Also, could you briefly list in which original Tibetan texts these stories are found? Cheers, --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 12:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply