Hi Garlicboy. I see that you are mainly responsible for working on Indian-Germans. If you can, could you add references to the article? Rintrah 04:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


reference: [1] best regards from garlicboy , 17:45 , 16th December 2006 (UTC)

another reference: [2]

Thanks Garlicboy; good work. I have removed the reference tag. Rintrah 15:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bharat matrimony

A tag has been placed on Bharat matrimony, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Bharat matrimony. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. --Finngall talk 21:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

long hair edit

The article as written is rather inchoate, with a mixture of original research, Bible references not translated into English, and disambiguation notices about a performer or something called "Long Hair" (not to be confused with the American musician called "Professor Longhair"). Most of this stuff belongs in the article Hair, I suspect. --Orange Mike 13:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not continue adding biased religious contributions to this article. An extensive list of biblical references referred to as "the word" is not encyclopedic. JHMM13 20:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arabic-English loanwords edit

Hi,

Thanks for creating this article. I have proposed that it should be merged with List of Arabic loanwords in English, which covers exactly the same ground. Please add any comments you feel necesary at Talk:Arabic-English loanwords. Peace, Drmaik 05:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Citizen Journalism in India edit

 

A tag has been placed on Citizen Journalism in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 21:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Citizen Journalism in India edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Citizen Journalism in India, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? KurtRaschke (talk) 23:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Luigi Poletti edit

I read just now your message, where you wrote me to have adjusted the article on Luigi Poletti (i know, it's a long time ago..). I'm just curious: how do you know Luigi Poletti and his studies? all the best! Daniele85 (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply