GamerBoyMike
April 2020 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
GamerBoyMike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wasn't even vandalizing anything at all, I was only making adjustments and corrections to pages that I thought had information that is a bit inaccurate. This was all a misunderstanding and I would never vandalize anything under any circumstances. I am just giving note that I have been blocked falsely and even though I have been following the rules of editing, this whole thing about me vandalizing is false and I was only fixing any info I thought was sort of inaccurate. Thank you for understanding. GamerBoyMike (talk) 23:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your edits appeared to be vandalism because things were changed without explanation and without reliable sources to support them. It is not enough to change something that you "thought was sort of inaccurate". You must have a source to support the information you want to add. An unblock here is certainly possible, but you will need to specifically describe how your edits will be different henceforth. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- To reviewing admin: I've not found any constructive edits here. Every edit except one appears to be subtle date vandalism, shifting dates by 1-2 years, commonly seen in the article areas affected. The one other edit changed the title of a short film, which did not match the title given in the source. If you feel the unblock is viable, I would like a condition that the editor acknowledge they must explain their edits and provide sourcing. -- ferret (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
GamerBoyMike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well, I guess I have no choice left but to confess my guilt. I guess I have been vandalizing when it came to edits. I just didn't know that I was actually making things worse. I didn't think that lack of description to an edit was considered vandalism (to be honest, that actually makes sense because I have understood that you cannot get away with an edit silent and that you need an acceptable source and/or an explanation to come off clean). I understand what I did was wrong, and I apologize for this certain type of action. I promise that next time I ever do a certain type of edit that changes information that seem accurate enough, I will try to include an explanation that at at least has reason within it. And if I can defend my reasoning, I will also try and add a reliable source. I genuinely apologize for any inconvenience caused and I will try to abide by the editing policy. Thank you for also understanding. GamerBoyMike (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You acknowledge you were vandalising, but you somehow claim you didn't know you were making things worse?!? You clearly lack sufficient competence to edit here, or you are outright trolling. In either case, no, Wikipedia is far better off without allowing you to continue editing. Yamla (talk) 10:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
GamerBoyMike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(I hope I'm not spamming this template) Ok so, this unblock request is also a response to what message I saw when declined 2nd time: What I meant by not knowing about making worse changes was that I should've thought twice before I approved of my own edits, not exactly that I wasn't aware of what I was doing. (maybe I should've written that instead) I was also making a request for someone to actually understand me here and not see me as the wrong person and instead, someone who will try to help later on hereafter. Needless to say, I was currently stressing out because of the occurrence taking place. I was really understanding that I've made a huge mistake but for how I was seeing it earlier, it didn't seem like anyone was actually believing me (even though my disappointment in myself was probably understood by some) and if the unbelieving were to be the case, to me, that would've been a big problem. I very, deeply apologize if this makes matters sort of worse, but as I was trying to express earlier, I was only trying to make a request for someone to actually understand my confession and my promise to never make edits that seem unclear. I've written a much politer request earlier, but it never seemed to have really been seen as a request of trust. I was really serious about being honest with my mistakes here. I made a very, very clear promise, I pledged to make sure I was doing the right this when coming to editing, I was trying to do everything so I can then actually abide by the rules next time to be seen as someone who really understands by showing that I am a much obedient digital citizen. *clears throat* Anyways, what I'm trying to say here is: Yes, I do have awareness when it comes to editing, I'm just saying that next time, If I ever try to approve of action of any kind, I will think more carefully on what I'm doing whether it's good or bad. Thank you for understanding, and I sincerely and earnestly apologize if this causes any more inconvenience. Again, If this request is understood, Thank you, and have a Nice day : ) GamerBoyMike (talk) 22:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please clearly and concisely articulate what you did wrong, why it was wrong, and how you will edit constructively. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 03:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
GamerBoyMike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Okay, so I'm just going to make this a bit more simple. The wrongdoing I continuously proceeded to commit was subtle date vandalism. Why it was wrong: I took year information that was already accurate enough and unnecessarily tried to "correct" the information while in reality, I was just making things worsen. How I will be constructive with edits: If I ever try to "correct" accurate info, I will: Carefully describe my edits, and cite a more reliable source to go with my reasoning/summary in order to come off clean. And I will also think twice before approving of my own edits and submitting them online. So since I made my request more simple, I'm now going to send my best wishes for Wikipedia users to have a nice day. Yes, especially the admins of this site : ) GamerBoyMike (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Claiming that correct information was "accurate enough" and that you were trying to "correct" it by making it incorrect is absurd. You are clearly trolling us, so I have removed your ability to edit this talk page. See WP:UTRS if you ever want to make a sensible unblock appeal. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.