Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit

Dear Galerivs: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! --omtay38 03:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Rasonalizam article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! DVD+ R/W 03:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Astounding/Analog

edit

Hi, Galerivs; welcome to Wikipedia. I do a fair amount of editing of science fiction magazines, so I'm glad to see a new editor who's interested in that topic.

It looks like you feel that the article on Astounding ought to be separate from the one on Analog, since you've created a new article, Astounding-Stories, with material only about the magazine's history up to 1960. This would be a big change and would need to be discussed on the Analog talk page, so I'm going to reverse your changes, so that everything points to the Analog page, for now. I for one think it's probably better to keep it as a single article, despite the name change. If you do think they should be split, post a note on the talk page there explaining your reasons, and we can discuss it. And of course if you have any questions about Wikipedia, or about editing here, please ask; I'll be glad to help as best I can. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I see you've reverted my edits; I've started a discussion here, which you're welcome to join. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply