Funkymonkey6966666

March 2021

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Owen Bonnici, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WisdomSideKick per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WisdomSideKick. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Funkymonkey6966666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have only made reasonable edits while backing it up with references, there was no need to revert and block. Funkymonkey6966666 (talk) 07:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Funkymonkey6966666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

that account was used by someone else under the same public ip, I have resorted to editing and updating intelligently such section to give it a revamp and take care of mentioned vandalism done by the individual Funkymonkey6966666 (talk) 08:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That does not explain the fact that you were editing about the exact same topic. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. The technical evidence does not support Funkymonkey's claim. --Yamla (talk) 09:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Yamla - they've made another account, DarkChocolate101. See the SPI... Pahunkat (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)