User talk:Fugu Alienking/Archive 2

< Archive 1

Archive 2

All Pages:

1 -  2 -  ... (up to 100)

RE: Mikael Ljungman

I noted that it was an SPA commenting on that discussion. However, you'll note that only two people were saying to delete it (and another mentioned "weak delete"). I'd rather see such articles be improved, rather than deleted. Since only a few people even commented on the discussion at all, there really was no clear consensus to delete it. You are welcome to go to Deletion Review, but I think that the article could be improved, rather than deleted. - Rjd0060 (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mikael Ljungman. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please use the Talk Page as requested by other editors--Needlepinch (talk) 15:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Magibon

An article that you have been involved in editing, Magibon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (3rd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Pedofenion (talk) 14:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Magibon

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Magibon. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magibon (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Magibon

I've re-nominated her for deletion. Pisomojado (talk) 07:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Your email

Do you have email enabled on Wikipedia? I don't see it, and I'd like to just send you a now-scanned copy of the Forbes 2005 list.DavidWestT (talk) 01:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

No, I don't have email for non-administrative purposes enabled on Wikipedia. If you need to communicate with me, do it here in the open. —Fugu Alienking (contribs) 03:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

How then do I submit the scanned copy of the Forbes list? Our notice on the other noticeboard goes unanswered.DavidWestT (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

@fugualienking Page locked? Does page does acurately reflect press? I don't see these listed as sources. "Notorious Gangsters and No Games: The Gory Story of the Gizmodo" March 10,2015 or this recent one that reads like a movie-of-the-week "The Weird, Wild Saga of Gizmodo" March 14, 2016 or the "Get Fugu Fiasco - High Humor Continues" Fugu2much (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

​ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fugu_Alienking&action=edit&section=new @fugualienking judging by your extensive edit history for Carl Freer, I'm surprised that you have not updated the page in while. Today's version seems very white washed. Thought you may appreciate the new source material and want to update page accordingly. The following citations from a 6 part expose on thedrive.com earlier this year.

Citation 1: "In the late 1990s, before Gizmondo existed, Freer ran a luxury car dealership and importer in Monte Carlo. According to court records, around this time Eriksson was leading a criminal outfit, dubbed the Uppsala Mafia, outside Stockholm. He had already been convicted and imprisoned for weapons possession, cocaine distribution, assault, counterfeiting, and fraud charges. Apart from extortion and drugs, the Uppsala Mafia also dealt with stolen cars."

Citation 2: "Between 2002 and 2006, Bo Stefan Eriksson and Carl Freer raised $400 million for their tech start-up, Tiger Telematics, and grew their company to a billion-dollar corporation by 2005. Less than 10 months later the stock would be worth pennies, and over $380 million in cash would disappear. It was an unprecedented multinational scam that burned investors from London to Los Angeles."

Source: http://www.thedrive.com/news/2559/the-weird-wild-saga-of-gizmondo-part-1 March 14, 2016

Fugutoomuch (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)FuguTooMuch

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Fugu Alienking. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)