Froggydarb

User Page	Talk	Photography	Maps	To Do

Froggydarb's Talk

Archive 1 (May-August 2006) Have a croak Posting notes: Unless you request otherwise, I will reply to your posts on your talk page. Leave your message at the bottom of this page. I usually archive my talk page every 3 month. If you wish to comment on an archived topic; copy and paste the entire topic to the bottom of this page and add your comment. Please sign your comments by inserting ~~~~ at the end of your comment Thank you! -- Froggydarb croak More maps Hi, if you have the information and get a chance, could you make distro maps for the salt and freshwater crocodiles please.--Peta 11:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Amphibians of Australia Thanks, it took a long time! There is still some work needed for it (especially to include the Hylids), but I am pretty happy with how far along it is. This article has great potential, I hope we can get it to FA and FL (I think we will need to split it). Good work with it so far. --liquidGhoul 10:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Nice talk page by the way. --liquidGhoul 10:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC) How are the images now? --liquidGhoul 12:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Why are you removing the italics from all the genera names, they are supposed to have them (see WP:TOL). --liquidGhoul 06:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC) Peer review The article is coming along nicely. I'd be good if some of the inline cites were to original paper sources - since the information provided by the IUCN etc. is usually just a summary of someone elses research. I can get pdfs of most recently published journal articles, so take a look at this list and let me know if there are any articles you'd like to have the full text for.--Peta 07:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC) License tagging for Image:Crocodylus johnstoni range.png Thanks for uploading Image:Crocodylus johnstoni range.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC) VandalProof I noticed you attempted to add your name to the VandalProof request page, however you added your name in the Approved section and not the Awaiting_Approval section as required. If you would like to be considered please add your name there, as the Moderator software would have deleted your name without us noticing (if I hadn't caught it beforehand). Thanks in advance - Glen 09:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Maps and frogs Hi, the maps look great, thanks. About sources for the frog article - I think that is important where possible to cite original research - not an organisations interpretation of that research, it realtes to the idea of a reliable sources and I think it is important to give some acknowlegdement to the people who actaully did all the hard work, so if you change your mind about wanting to look at the original papers just leave me a message.--Peta 00:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC) Re:GGBF Not their winter breeding habitat, just their winter retreat habitat. The paper is at the top of this list, but I can only get it by hard copy, so I can't send it to you. --liquidGhoul 03:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC) Use the abstract of that paper if you have to, it contains enough results for an encyclopaedia. I can't think of anything that is missing. It still needs a copyedit by someone better than me. Also, I think you should address Tnarg's concerns on the talk page. Thanks --liquidGhoul 04:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC) Copyedit I did as requested; reordered sentences to improve flow in one section and left several inline comments on fragments where there were questions about word choice or, in one instance, a convoluted sentence whose meaning was not unambiguous. I'd rather you improved it than me guessing it wrong. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 21:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC) Opisthodon He has written the source on many of the articles. Here, I am currently downloading it (>9mb). --liquidGhoul 06:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC) OK, I just saw that you saw the source. Good reading :). --liquidGhoul 06:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC) Roy/HG Froggy, (not sure if I'm doing this correctly, apologies if I am) but the changes I made to Roy and HG's origin commentary page were NOT nonsense-I've listened to every one for the last 5 years, I can assure you of that. The previous unsigned comment was written by 211.31.57.32 WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award Froggydarb, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done. Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 08:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Pelodrydinae Don't fret. We won't take action on this part of the paper, it says itself that they weren't thorough enough on these frogs (only a few species were tested). Another paper is coming out soon, and it will deal with the Pelodryines. Always remember to sign your comments :) Thanks --liquidGhoul 11:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Congrats Congrats on the Green and Golden Bell Frog FA. Now you have to put up with it being on the main page (you can practice with Cane Toad, it will be on in two days). Not a good experience, that one. --liquidGhoul 13:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Cute frog! Yay frog I love the frog at the top of your userpage - so cute! -- Natalya 16:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC) WIkipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award Greetings, Froggydarb. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Buchanan-Hermit for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here. If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 16:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC) Good job on the userpage though. It's actually my favorite out of all the finalists (if you don't count me). :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 05:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Actually, I didn't expect to win... I was relieved just to be a finalist. :) -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 06:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Aus frog list It seems that most of that info should be in the genera articles. I had assumed that was what was happening when I came across it a while ago. You should try and merge as much info from it as possible into the repective genus articles. --liquidGhoul 06:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC) lol, rightio. I don't think it is a necessary article then. You can get all the links to Australian genera through Amphibians of Australia, and can see the info in those articles. --liquidGhoul 06:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Featured pic Just making sure you knew your photo is on the main page. --liquidGhoul 07:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Find anything tadpoling? --liquidGhoul 09:02, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Cool, was that with FATS? --liquidGhoul 10:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC) littlejohni tadpole Don't you think the photo's a little dark? Do you have anything lighter? My photos came out quite a bit brighter.--Tnarg12345 10:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Award The Photographer's Barnstar I award you with The Photographer's Barnstar, because of your extraordinary photographs in the field of nature. Keep up the good work! Captain ginyu 13:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award Froggydarb, thanks for signing up for the Esperanza User Page Contest. The judges have received the fifteen entries, and are ready to start judging. The judges will take a week to complete the judging process, and they will contact all the participants when the judging is done. Please drop by the contest page for contest updates and questions. Take care, and good luck! May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 15:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC) frogs pictures - preditors I know this isnt the preferred type of frog photographs but you may be able to use it in articles about preditors of frogs. commons:Egretta novaehollandiae --Gnangarra 06:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:Froggydarb Template:Froggydarb has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC) The redirect Template:Froggydarb has been deleted per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 September 9#Template:Froggydarb .E2.86.92 User:Froggydarb.2FGFDL-self. I have replaced all occurrences of the redirect with a subst of the target page. You may continue to use your license template in the same manner by using {{subst:User:Froggydarb/GFDL-self}} in place of {{froggydarb}}. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 15:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Coverage maps Hi Froggydarb. I've noticed your excellent work on coverage maps, such as this example. At the Australian wine article, we're in need of something similar, though I'm not graphically minded in any way as much as I'd love to be. Are you able to help out when you've got some time? -- Longhair 02:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Excellent. There's coverage maps available here, under the Map of Australian Wine Zones link, which detail the wine regions of Australia. What we're aiming for I guess is a freely licenced coverage map of Australian wine regions usable for Wikipedia. I hope that explains our needs. If not, feel free to ask me to clear anything up you're unsure about. Thanks again. -- Longhair 03:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Regions aren't really necessary for now I think. Just a basic map detailing wine production coverage should be fine. -- Longhair 10:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC) That looks fantastic and close to what we need. Are you able to add a simple legend off to one side to show why regions are marked as different colours and their respective names? -- Longhair 01:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC) Looking good. I'll let the others know at Talk:Australian wine to see what they think. Thanks for the speed in getting this done and your great efforts to date. -- Longhair 04:26, 4 September 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award Greetings, Froggydarb. The judges would like to announce that the winner for the Esperanza User Page Contest has been chosen. Congratulations to Misza13 for winning the contest. The winning entry can be found here. If you'd like to participate in the contest again, check by the contest page in a few days and sign up. See you around. May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|) 09:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Frog life cylce I was wondering whether you had a better version of the life-cycle than is currently on the frog article. I would like one which has a really good tadpole photo, and every stage the same species (maybe Limnodynastes peronii would be easiest?). I really don't like the current one. The photos look depressing, and I doubt they are all the same species. Thanks. --liquidGhoul 02:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Finding the morph will prove to be the limiting factor. I am going swabbing tomorrow (L. aurea, but also any species possible), so will keep an eye out. However, it will be very hard to find metamorphs, I don't think I've ever seen one with a tail. The Mixophyes in Tyler's Natural History book is beautiful, and large, but most species are absolutely tiny. Might be an idea to go frogging when Mixophyes fasciolatus tadpoles are about to morph. --liquidGhoul 09:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Nope. I saw some very early stage tadpoles, but that was it. The GGBFs weren't out (little cold). A whole section was completely flooded from the recent rain though, so there was a huge floodplain, and the frogs were loving it. We went swabbing there. Also saw two rats. --liquidGhoul 22:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC) We caught L. fallax, Lit. peronii, Lim peronii, Lit. tyleri and C. signifera. We also heard Lim. tasmaniensis and L' dentata. Nothing really special, but it is/was a highly disturbed site. --liquidGhoul 02:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Extinct frogs What's your source for the T. acutirostris specimen in 1996? --liquidGhoul 12:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC) Rightio, that's fine. My reference was also from JCU, so it's all good. --liquidGhoul 13:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) Crinia parinsignifera With that recent edit to Crinia parinsignifera, are you just talking about with Crinia sloanei, or both species? --liquidGhoul 13:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) That sounds like both are distinguished by call alone. I am certain that it is only call for signifera but was unsure for sloanei. Also, I was only talking not distinguishing them based on physical appearance, but I can see how my wording was ambiguous. I was planning on mentioning the call in the ecology and behaviour section, but must have forgotten. Thanks. --liquidGhoul 00:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC) Map Hi, if you have time could you please make a numbat distrobution map, you can see one here. Thanks. --Peta 06:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Mixophyes It says in the abstract that the two new species were not suspected. So you may be thinking of something else. Either that, or they have taken a long time to write the paper. --liquidGhoul 05:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC) User:Froggydarb/ausfroglist Do you mind if others can edit this list, so we have an idea of what is done, and what needs to be done further. Also, if we create an article, we can move it up the list, and if it is on everyone's watchlist, we can tell when a new article has been created. It would be good to have a link to it for the new Australian biota project. Also, I would like to bold those which have photographs. Thanks. --liquidGhoul 14:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC) New to this, but passed your link somewhere an hour ago :P I recently got some pictures you may like. One here, [1]is a grainy zoom from these - [2] and [3] you may be able to do better with your picture editing software. They were taken in my suburban backyard near Kookaburra Park in Rocklea, Brisbane, QLD ( Large creek there but I can't find the name of it. Also turtles & ducks are regulars there) Yes that is a home-brew keg he is sitting on :) --Bentalphanerd 16:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC) POTY 2006 The arrangements for the Commons:Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 11:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC) Image:Bufoinvasion.gif Hi,tanks for the awesome animation for the cane toad article. However, I would like to see it go up to 2005 if at all possible? [4] may help. Thanks — Jack · talk · 09:49, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 Page name For some reason I have been working on WA amphibians, because it is interesting to learn about them I suppose. It also gives me a break from controversial subjects, so don't think I'm going to be hard-nosed about this. How do you feel about the idea of putting them under their scientific names and using redirects for the common names. It seems to me that it would avoid any problems that might emerge with naming and ambiguity, especially if the rest of the world starts doing theirs. Also, would you like me to notify you of the frog stubs I create so you can add those useful distribution maps. Or can you give me some tips on creating them without me bothering you with my stubs. BTW, you may be interested in this, I just did it for a bit of fun. I'm not sure if it is needed in main space. Regards Fred 19:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Image:Froggydarb.png listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Froggydarb.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 18:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Commons Do you want to upload your image of frog to commons for foreign wiki ? it should be great. thanks. 86.76.216.38 09:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Image:Rheobatrachus silus.jpg Hello Froggydarb, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Rheobatrachus silus.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Froggydarb/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC) The Amphibians and Reptiles Portal (P:AAR) The Amphibians and Reptiles Portal I'm glad to announce that The Amphibians and reptiles portal (P:AAR) has been created and is ready for you to use. This portal covers any subjects related to amphibians, reptiles, herpetology, as well as WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles. Purposes of the portal to act as the "main page" for editors interested in amphibians and reptiles. The portal page should contain all the common and useful links to relevant articles, lists, categories, as well as the project tasklist. As this portal is your tool, please feel free to organize, modify, or expand the Topics, Categories, Lists, and Tasklist sections of the portal as you see fit. to lead potential AAR editors to WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles as well as to educate general readers. Feel free to add more items for the "Did you know..." section. Thank you for reading. If you have any questions, please leave them on the portal talk page or my user talk page. --Melanochromis --Melanochromis 06:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC) WikiProject Australia newsletter WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC). <3 love the first frog on your main page.] WikiProject Australia newsletter WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC). Speedy deletion of Image:Vitellinus distribution.png A tag has been placed on Image:Vitellinus distribution.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Vitellinus distribution.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jesse Viviano (talk) 05:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC) WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles: Rollcall At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, we recently did a purge of the members list, which your name was on. Please re-add your username as well as your area of expertise at our list of participants if you plan to stay active in this Wikiproject. Also, a discussion is going on regarding the standardization of taxonomy in lizard articles, located in this section. We'd like to have some more voices in this matter. Thanks everyone! bibliomaniac15 23:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC) WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008 The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC) NowCommons: File:Litoria pearsoniana.JPG File:Litoria pearsoniana.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Litoria pearsoniana 2.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Litoria pearsoniana 2.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC) E-mail Hello, Froggydarb. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 23:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Platypus Hey, your opinion is requested at the talk page of the platypus article, to finally put this stupid capitalisation debate to rest. Cheers! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Cane toad map Hi Froggydarb, I edited the Cane toads in Australia article to take account of the recently released new film Cane toads: the conquest and I saw your wonderful map of their distribution from 1940-1980. Would it be possible to update that map? I understand these toads have reached much further south now. I have read reports of them in southern Sydney. Cheers, Whiteghost.ink 12:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Science lovers wanted! Science lovers wanted! Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Photo usage Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures. I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Glass_frog2.jpg And I attributed the picture like this: Froggydarb with this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Froggydarb and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672 Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 09:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC) P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available. File:Froggydarb's Userpage.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Froggydarb's Userpage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC) File:Froggydarb's Userpage.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Froggydarb's Userpage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 13:38, 21 May 2013 (UTC) Photo usage Hello Froggydarb I am working on a Conservation Science textbook and our authors wanted to use your photo of 'An adult cane toad (Rhinella marina)' posted on Wikipedia Cane Toad page. Would you be willing to waive the 'share-alike' provision of the CC license for this textbook use? I can send further information about the project if needed. Please respond to my direct email: ts.photopix@gmail.com Kind regards Ts.photopix (talk) 18:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:Heleioporus australiacus distribution map.png The file File:Heleioporus australiacus distribution map.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Orphaned map. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page. Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 15:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Rheobatrachus silus.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Rheobatrachus silus.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC) Proposed deletion of File:Froggydarb's Userpage.png The file File:Froggydarb's Userpage.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Unused personal photo. Out of scope. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page. Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC) FAR for Green and golden bell frog I have nominated Green and golden bell frog for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 16:50, 9 July 2022 (UTC)