FranzN
A tag has been placed on Matador (toy), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SamBC 04:19, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- I did contest the "blatant advertising" verdict and the deletion by all the rules, without being notified the SAME user that did the first deletion speedily deleted the page again. FranzN 15:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- I deleted because the article still made no assertion, via appropriate references, of why it was notable. I don't delete for fun - if you can find references that assert notability, I'll do whatever else is necessary to keep this article. Jimfbleak 05:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I put the reasons on the discussion page of the incriminated one. This is gone now, and I need to do research again. I remember comparing it to similar pages in Wikipedia. FranzN 10:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)