Fra Angelica

Categories

Hello Fra Angelica, please consult Wikipedia:Categorization for an overview on the categorization process. Articles should not be categorized into Category:Education or Category:Classical music, because those are supercategories, i.e. a category of categories. You should always try to categorize into the most applicable subcategory; if there isn't one, then you likely don't have the correct category. Also, you don't need to categorize into both Category:Charities based in the United Kingdom and Category:Music charities based in the United Kingdom, since the latter is a subcategory of the former. intforce (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Jens Lehmann

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Jens Lehmann. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Can context and subject matter have any bearing on how one might assess a source? WP:RSP has different levels of reliability:

• "Deprecated", like the Daily Mail: "The source is considered generally unreliable, and use of the source is generally prohibited."
• "Generally unreliable": "Outside exceptional circumstances, the source should normally not be used, and it should never be used for information about a living person."
• "No consensus": "The source is marginally reliable (i.e. neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable), and may be usable depending on context."
• "Generally reliable in its areas of expertise"

Based on this, I would assume context plays a role in the "no consensus" category. The Daily Mail – which, I believe, apart from solid reporting has also frequently published outright falsehoods in the area of sports – should be avoided altogether. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC)