Please don't blank the VfD page for The Jesus of History. It doesn't matter whether you created the article in question and/or want it deleted. No matter what your motivation for blanking the page was, it's easy to see it as an attempt to disrupt the VfD process. /sɪzlæk˺/ 08:23, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wrong.Wiki is just not for me!


In a revision of 06:12, 19 Feb 2005, this User added at Gospel of Matthew the seemingly knowing remark "Some believe the author also used the M document." I surmise that this is a hypothetical document similar to the "Q Gospel" invented to explain some characteristics of Matthew not otherwise accounted for. I can find no reference to an "M Document" however. Presenting such an obscure hypothesis without a word of disambiguation is not very reader-friendly. Now that we are all fully aware of how ignorant we are, might we have some illumination here, and a brief entry at the redlink?--Wetman 20:41, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)