Hello, Fozbozz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Johnny Michael Foster, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dreamoirs, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Fozbozz. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dreamoirs".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dreamoirs}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, just letting you know that I had to remove your additions to the Niimi, Okayama article. The blog you linked to is clearly written by the JET teachers themselves, so it is not a reliable independent source of information. If a newspaper publishes about the JET programme in Niimi, then we can include the information. Regards, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I see what you are saying. Several newspapers have written about the JET programme in Niimi, but I didn't think to include them. Here is a list of a few:
Furthermore, the JET programme ALTs were also on Line News - Line News: Niimi ALTs - note that the article is no longer accessible- I am unsure whether there is a time limit for Line News articles, but I have a screenshot of the articleFile:Line News article screenshot.jpgLine News screenshot
Additionally, the Niimi JET Programme ALTs' work has been featured on live Japanese television in both news reports (a snippet of which is shown in Article 2 above), as well as in the Niimi JET Programme ALTs' own television show to help teach English language through a different medium. Some of those episodes have been uploaded to YouTube and can be found here (English Paradise (Niimi JET Programme ALT television show) - Episode 1, English Paradise - Episode 2)
The ALTs are also featured in the local magazine every month, to add English language content for the citizens of Niimi.
Niimi is actually one of the Japanese government's 'guinea pig' regions for English language education, which is why it is home to 12 ALTs despite its very small size, whereas larger cities like Okayama City only have around 3 or 4. However, I have no references to that, hence why I had not written that on the Wikipedia page for Niimi.
Is this not enough evidence to mention the pioneering work that is done here for English language education?
Hi, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I also replied to your message on my talk page, but let's keep the conversation in one place here.
The Sanyo news is definitely a reliable source that you can use. The Oricon and Line articles merely reproduce Sanyo's reports, so I wouldn't bother with them. Generally speaking, YouTube is not considered a reliable source, but it depends how you use it. By the sounds of it, there should be some further information in reports issued by the national education ministry. If you want to have another go at adding to the article based on those sources, I can have a look and give you a few more tips. Cheers, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
