For Truth's Sake!

Protocols of Zion

Hello - could you please discuss your changes to the external links on the talkpage - I've had a quick look at those links and they seem suitable for a wikipedia article - can you explain why you feel otherwise? --Fredrick day 19:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Frederick, I changed the links only for this reason: they should come from "objective sources" not from organizations who are devoted openly to a certain viewpoint. But I respect "the more links the better" philosophy, and therefore, I shan't be removing links anymore. I have added two links that give look at the Protocols from opposing viewpoints for balance. I've only recently discovered this Protocol controversy and frankly, I am obsessed right now. When I get excited, I don't always stop and think, but I shall try to be more thoughtful in the future. However, I found it odd and surprising to find that certain parties consider the Protocols to be an established fraud. I've just started, but I don't think there is enough hard and solid evidence to call it a fraud with Absolute Certainty. Perhaps most likely a fraud, perhaps not. Who knows for sure? I know I don't. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by For Truth's Sake! (talk • contribs).

Hi - first off when you post on a talkpage, you need to add --~~~~ at the end to sign your posts (or you can use the signature button at the top of the edit window. In regards to sources, you should read - WP:EL which explains the standard of external links that wikipedia accepts. http://www.jewwatch.com/ certainly raised a lot of eyebrows when it was added and it would not be considered a suitable source as per WP:EL - if you still feel you want to add that source, I suggest that you mention it on the talkpage. However it is only fair to warm you a site that seems to promote neo-nazi thinking and holocaust denial is likely to never to be accepted. --Fredrick day 22:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)