Flyer322

December 2014

Hello, I'm Tiptoety. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tiptoety ^talk 21:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Human skin color

Please note that Wikipedia articles should be based on material published in reliable sources. Please do not remove such material and replace it with your own unsourced personal opinions. AndyTheGrump (talk)

Your recent editing history at Human skin color shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Human skin color with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Oroso (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Human skin color. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Human skin color was changed by Flyer322 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884423 on 2014-12-23T22:07:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Human skin color. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tiptoety ^talk 22:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)