Flowerman11
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Bloomex, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! CaptainMorgan (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Bloomex edit
Please initiate discussion on the article's talk page before deleting a substantial amount of text. Thanks! CaptainMorgan (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Your removal of a valid source appears to be vandalism. Please restore the material that you removed from Bloomex. If you don't do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 21:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
May 2009 edit
The recent edit you made to Bloomex constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Bloomex, you will be blocked from editing. You also appear to have a conflict of interest on this article. And the claim that "Some consumers and business rivals are trying to use this fact to discredit Bloomex business." is original research Dougweller (talk) 13:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Removal of sourced negative information, apparent WP:COI editing. EdJohnston (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
And you went right back to this after coming back from your block. Due to this and your apparently high conflict of interest, this time you're blocked indefinitely. Blueboy96 02:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bloomex. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomex (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)