FloreatAntiquaDomus

You may already have spotted WP:CANTAB, which is not quite dead, although it appears to be slightly more dead than WP:OXFORD (my side of the divide!) Any contribution you can make to the work of the light blues (or to dark blue matters on fields of overlapping interest) would, I'm sure, be greatly appreciated. Bencherlite^Talk 18:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I have had a swan around some oxford college boat clubs, specifically Jesus, came across a lot of edits by yourself. Well done. It looks great, reads well and is far more informative then any cambridge college boat club article. I am concentrating on Corpus Christi specific things for now but I am planning to move through cambridge boat clubs doing some basic expansion and clean-up. Beyond that I would like to revamp the uni boat clubs. FloreatAntiquaDomus 02:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Corpus

I take it you're a Corpuscle then? Good work on the Corpus article, it really did need a fresh eye to look at it.Wozzy25 (talk) 11:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Upward and Ord

Thanks Floreat for spotting that, hadn't meant to delete Upward when adding Ord.217.37.40.185 (talk) 08:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Piers Gaveston Society

I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Piers Gaveston Society, as it was kept following a deletion discussion in 2006 and per policy is permanently ineligible for proposed deletion. I only did this to comply with policy and have no comment one way or the other on the merits of your deletion nomination. If you still wish to pursue deletion, you need to open another deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion; please look over the arguments made in the first deletion discussion (linked from the article's talk page) as well as WP:BEFORE before opening another deletion discussion. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, will do. Was my first deletion attempt - good to know. FloreatAntiquaDomus 17:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)