Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Firkin Flying Fox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your inaccurate post

edit

Re. this edit. You are factually wrong to claim I am the only editor doubtful of the bestseller claims (apparently you did not even look on the relevant talk page before saying such a thing). I would add that your taunting me about my topic ban, and continued assumptions of bad faith are in very poor taste. I believe that a retraction, and an apology on this page would be in order. Prunesqualor billets_doux 21:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I read the talk page and stand by my claim - you are the only one who is currently still doubtful. You were banned for POV pushing, and it seems you are still at it, so no, there will be no apology, and no retraction. Firkin Flying Fox (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
You are mistaken. BTW might I ask, Have you ever edited under a different username/account? Prunesqualor billets_doux 11:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

East Berlin

edit

I saw that you were previously involved in editing the infobox of East Germany, to remove a qualifier that another editor added to the capital ([1]). That issue has resurfaced, so perhaps you woudl like to participate in the discussion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:East_Germany#Capital_city Jeff Song (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll provide my input there, thank you. Firkin Flying Fox (talk) 01:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

1rr

edit

You have violated the 1 revert rule, you are only allowed to revert one time within 24 hours. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I see one revert, of your edit. Where is the second one? Firkin Flying Fox (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The inaccurate and unaffiliated category's were removed on 10th march: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qal%27at_Bustra&diff=543220218&oldid=523467185

your reverted twice:

1st revert:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qal%27at_Bustra&diff=553843716&oldid=553842192

2nd: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Qal%27at_Bustra&diff=553856258&oldid=553854524

--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I see my change was already undone by someone else - Good luck with the claim that my edit that partially undid something you wrote over two months ago is a "revert" in this context.Firkin Flying Fox (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Discretionary sanctions warning

edit
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP:ARBPIA3#500/30

edit

Pr WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, all "accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition may be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters."

And yes, that means you at the moment, as you have less than 200 edits. Please edit in a less contentious area of Wikipedia, until you reach the required limit, thank you, Huldra (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have been editing for several years now. . Firkin Flying Fox (talk) 08:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but according to this, you have less than 200 edits. A minimum of 500 edits is required to making edits "related to the Arab-Israeli conflict", Huldra (talk) 21:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Attention required

edit

Hi. I have provided three strong reference for the article Saba Faisal nominated for deletion. check the article page for references. Sneha Hurrain (talk) 06:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Firkin Flying Fox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Firkin Flying Fox. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

AE

edit

WP:AE#Firkin Flying Fox nableezy - 09:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply