Revert of Buffalo Treehopper edit

I read through that article twice (well I supposed I must have scanned) and didn't see that sentence about the sonic range. Thanks for the revision and sorry for the trouble. Cheers. --FilmFan69 (talk) 23:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem, simple mistake. Welcome to Wikipedia! If you have any sort of questions I'm happy to help! --Falcorian (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Dark Knight edit

Yeah, I know. It won't be an issue here shortly, because I'm leaving for my internship and I'll be gone for the rest of the night. I appreciate your concern and support. I already contacted the admin that un-semi protected the page and requested that he place it it back because of the increasing edits from various Anons that are tweaking the fate of Dent to be ambiguous. Though, there was one Anon that was doing good work cleaning up, and rewording things so I hope that they'll register and continue to edit the page if the semi-protection goes through.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Apparently, they snuck in just before the Admin protected the page. lol.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:05, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Personal Attacks edit

Don't make personal attacks as you did here [1]. You are well aware that we work by consensus, and as it stands the consensus is for Dent to be known as Dent, this is not just the view of Bignole but other users. You have 398 edits and 68 of them on The Dark Knight talk page alone. You need to assume good faith when editing rather than assuming some kind of conspiracy. I trust that you will not make this kind of attack again. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Feh. I'm impressed that you counted my edits though. Thanks for that.--FilmFan69 (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I didn't count them, the interiot tool did. Darrenhusted (talk)

Re; Kong edit

Would you rather call it a romance film or monster movie? The story of Kong is timeless but too recent to call a fairy tale. Adventure film is fine. Alientraveller (talk) 09:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ireland naming question edit

You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply