FMGC

Beyton and geese

You need to write in a way which is obviously neutral. It's not. Do that and perhaps you have a case - but there's way too much on what is utterly trivial and a clear hobbyhorse issue. Daily Mail is also specifically not a reliable source per wikipedia policy - it's named as such - so try and avoid that. EADT is better.

Your editing seems too close to the subject. Be careful of that - be neutral and deliberately adopt a neutral term - i.e. don't use "ruckus". Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Blue Square Thing

You are right I will add in some other sources. There is the BBC and ITV news, I will leave the Daily Mail source in there so people can make their own judgement. I didn't know that the Daily Mail is considered not to be a reliable source per Wikipedia Policy. I hope that satisfies you.

I am sorry but what is wrong with ruckus? I have cut and pasted the definition below. I think it fits the occurrence very well. Do you have another word you would like me to use?

ruck·us ˈrəkəs/Submit noun noun: ruckus; plural noun: ruckuses a disturbance or commotion. "a child is raising a ruckus in class" synonyms: disturbance, noise, racket, din, commotion, hubbub, fuss, uproar, furor, hue and cry, ruction, fracas; informalto-do, hullabaloo, rumpus, hoo-ha, ballyhoo, stink, foofaraw "the kids are raising a ruckus"

Ruckus doesn't have a neutral connotation. See WP:WORDS. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 15:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Beyton, and I noticed that your username, "Beyton village", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 15:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

ThePlatypusofDoom

I will change ruckus to disturbance, I have also added in more sources from various media groups and I also put in a request to change my username that makes won't make readers think I represent a group or a number of different people.

Blue Square Thing

I have added in more links so everything can be verified. There are a number of different sources through the media. I now think with your additions that this has now become quite neural and thank you for your help

I suggest you look at the detail of what I've done. The type of sources I've used and their neutrality, how I've cited them, (it really isn't that difficult to get some of this right) and how I've tried to ensure that the content I'm including is balanced and fair and represents what the sources are actually saying. We need balanced, neutral articles and we need to ensure that articles aren't dominated by a series of minor events in the 1000 plus year history of the village. I'm sure that, for example, I could write a section on how local democracy has been undermined by one individual bullying councillors into resignation. But that wouldn't be fair or balanced or reflect the sort of content we'd want in an article about a place. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)