Removing links edit

You should read somethings on Wikipedia policy involving internal links, external links, referencing and reliable sources. And discuss major changes on the talk page. Editors work hard to edit articles and find sources. What you're doing instead is pure vandalism. — Blue 14:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'm still new to all these rules and policies. I'll keep them in mind! FFXII International + Paul Rodgers (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by FFXII International + Paul Rodgers (talkcontribs) Reply

Invitation edit

You are invited to join Wikipedia: WikiProject Final Fantasy. — Blue 16:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Original research edit

To date, phrases such as "I believe", "I thought" and "I am pretty sure" cannot be attributed when making changes to an article. Citing yourself is frowned upon as original research - claims made without solid backing, either by secondary or tertiary sources. Therefore, please search for sources before making a claim. Thanks, and good luck. — Blue 11:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


"we don't know, and it's not "console"" edit

Thanks for the additions, but...

1. We do know. The Weekly Shounen Jump article blatantly states "Genre: RPG" 2. Read the console role-playing genre article. It applies to mobile and handheld games.

Also, if you're going to change an article name, you should really discuss it on the talk page, instead of just arbitrarily moving it. At the very least, the article should be "Final Fantasy IV the After: Tsuki no Kikan"; "the" because it's proper grammar, and ": Tsuki no Kikan" because the hyphens around "-月の帰還-" indicate that it's a subtitle. WtW-Suzaku (talk) 04:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Final Fantasy Tactics edit

Would you like to change your Oppose to Support, now that your concerns have been addressed? — Blue 15:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense added to World of Super Mario RPG edit

Do not add nonsense and garbage to wikipedia articles, this is not thought of as funny or amusing, and if you continue you will be blocked. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply