User talk:Exor674/Archive 1
Nice work with the recent changes patrol. -Reconsider! 08:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me - why did you revert my edits? Fermagli (talk) 12:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- My apologies if I reverted in error, your edits looked to me to be testing, instead of adding real content. Exor674 (talk) 12:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- I was adding content (and removing a bit about the subject's family that seemed irrelevant). The text as it stood before had clearly been written by a non-mathematician. May I revert? Fermagli (talk) 13:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Feel free Exor674 (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Cookie for you!
edit
Not fast enough
editHello Exor674. Please accept my humble apologies for my reversion. You reverted the page in between my eyes seeing the vandalism and my finger pushing the mouse button! Thatguyflint Talk to me! 15:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Totally forgiven -- I assumed from the moment you reverted that it was a mistake. Exor674 (talk) 15:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry
editSorry, I just made a mystake. It's the first time I use Wikipedia and I was trying to add some complements informations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.57.246.104 (talk) 04:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William David Owen (1874-1925)
edithi sorry if this is out of order - I am really not familiar with protocol here. just checking to see if you got my comment about being the author of the biography and if it is now ok to create the page with it on ? cheers, Tim (tim at rhosneigrpublishing dot co dot uk) 81.137.203.148 (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer permission
edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- While I'm here, would you like rollback? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure --Exor674 (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Done. Have fun (it's much faster than Twinkle, as you'll soon find out!), the template with what you need to know is below. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure --Exor674 (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
edit
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain tools, including Huggle, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Recent Edit
editThe comment's you removed from the Highlands Ranch page are factually based. If Wikipedia believes in providing accurate information I would strongly urge you to put back what I posted. The information is relevant to the area and would the rest of the state of Colorado would be deeply in your debt. Bigbluebannana (talk) 04:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |