Etaittunpe

• • Comment

February 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Wikipedia:Notability (numbers). Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Tim Vickers (talk) 05:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Etaittunpe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was just returning the page to its last version (Since which it was changed before getting consensus<oppositely to Wikipedia rules>, see the discussion page [1]

Decline reason:

That's not an excuse for editwarring. I'm extending your block to a week since you have been also abusing a sockpuppet account, Georgesy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), which was caught in your autoblock.  Sandstein  09:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not overwrite prior unblock requests, or this page will be protected.  Sandstein  12:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Etaittunpe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please check in, someone is trying to disturb my contributions, sorry for overwriting (it is my first use of this block, so I copied correctly but pasted wrongly) I hope ont to be punished for this!!:)

Decline reason:

The three-revert rule applies to all of us, even when we believe ourselves to be in the right. Next time, try one of the strategies at WP:DISPUTE to avoid edit-warring. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Etaittunpe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir FisherQueen, you acknowledge it is the first time, Please be sure it is also the last, and unblock me. Thank you for forgiving! <Eventually can you help me, Please check in, someone is trying to disturb my contributions, I am sure the second edit concerning three-revert rule was done while my computer was SHUT-DOWN!!!!??>

Decline reason:

If that's so, then per WP:GOTHACKED we will have to leave the account blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If the account is compromised, shouldn't this be changed to an indefinite block? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)