Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Wolfrock 21:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2007

edit
 

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead black males, you will be blocked from editing. Do not remove other people's votes from AfD's. It's disruptive and dishonest. Bfigura (talk) 04:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Dead black males

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Dead black males, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- Kl4m T C 04:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2007

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to GNAA, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: GNAA was changed by Erwin Morland (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-13T04:28:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 04:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

GNAA

edit

This article has been through the deletion debate 18 times already! Your edits will be reverted unless you participate in the debate. -- Kl4m T C 04:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I understand that the GNAA troll group's article has been deleted. However I am simply adding an acronym to the GNAA page, not trying to rebuild the troll group's page. Erwin Morland 04:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
If they don't have an article, what ambiguity needs to be resolved?Horrorshowj 04:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
See Talk:GNAA#Requesting_addition_of_Gay_Nigger_Association_of_America. Inclusion has already been discussed. The page was even protected for a while. -- Kl4m T C 04:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
When the GNAA gets an article it can have an entry on the GNAA page. Disambiguation pages are for listing articles and not for listing every possible acronym. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 17:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Erwin Morland for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Roleplayer (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why can't I edit _my_ user page? Erwin Morland (talk) 04:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erwin Morland (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to be banned from wikipedia.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.