Ellomate
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Ellomate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
memories edit
Small bants like the Yeezus record label dispute make me feel really glad I was a Wikipedia editor. Check the article now. Ellomate, one day he will be unbanned. 10:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC), Respecter of Jews
- also I'm evading this ban like a motherfucker Ellomate, one day he will be unbanned. 22:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
ban appealz!!! edit
Ellomate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Block appears to be politically motivated. I have been labelled as a "bigot", "neo-nazi", and troll, by fellow users because my own edits relating to politics. My research to Libertarian Party, which I thought add a monumental feat of having the first LGBT candidate, was done in a bold manner and with good faith. When my research turned out to be incorrect, I self reverted, and another user addded an equally awesome feat of the Libertarian Party. I learn from mistakes. I have never vandalized, nor have I ever intended to vandalise. Browser plugin added parenthesis which was immediately self-reverted as erroneous by browser.
I do not believe the punishment was made in proportion to my conduct. WP:INDEF lists "significant disruption" as a cause for an indefinite ban, and lists "the matter [being] resolved by discussion" as a remedy. Well, I'm here, sup niggas? As some other users mentioned in my ANI, I am a good user with a diverse range of edits. My choice of vocabulary may be unorthodox, but I stand by my ban appeals and correspondence.
Decline reason:
This is vandalism, and your "unorthodox" vocabulary is inappropriate for a collaborative project such as Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ellomate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Take that, "Bad Editor of the Day". For those that think this "little shit" deserves an unban, just remember, we tolerate this idiot too much. Every single edit you made in 2016, all 10 out of 40 edits that you made in 2016, were related to the Donald Trump campaign.
When users are calling you out as a bigot, I cannot step aside. It's only proper that in 38 minutes, an administrator should go from warning to indefinite block. After all, you are clearly not here to contribute to Wikipedia. Why? Mistakes aren't allowed, not even if a browser extension makes it on his behalf, and the problem is immediately addressed. His page creations, AfD contributions and policy input are irrelevant. I know one of you want him to answer questions, but too bad, because he's blocked. If you disagree with my judgement, I say this. Ignore good faith. Be reckless, but not bold. And remember this, "neo-Nazi": War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength.
Blocked indefinitely.Decline reason:
This "unblock request" does not address the reason for block at all. See WP:GAB and try again. By the way, if you have a browser extension that automatically insults Jews, you will not be unblocked unless you explain that issue. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
March 2018 edit
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Vanjagenije (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)