Speedy deletion of Vocaltone edit

 

A tag has been placed on Vocaltone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -Zeus- (t|c) 03:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vocaltone edit

 

A tag has been placed on Vocaltone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Vocaltone and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 03:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vocaltone. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Vocaltone. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 03:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vocaltone Networks edit

 

The article Vocaltone Networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Other than membership in other corporate organisations, there is no independent coverage and no significant coverage whatsoever, failing WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply