Ehr2VvW1Ros2

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ehr2VvW1Ros2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is very worrisome to note that accurate and factual information about philosophers of the peace movement in the 19th and 20th century is not appreciated by some editors on Wikipedia. These books may be found in the libraries of several world-renowned institutes for philosophy at leading Universities in several countries in Europe, including Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and a few more. Should the world not know about this? I don't see the problem that you seem to see. Ehr2VvW1Ros2 (talk) 11:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The stated reason for the block is block evasion, but you do not address that in this request. 331dot (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ehr2VvW1Ros2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A block against reason and knowledge is reminiscent of the Middle Ages, when the Feudal Lords were the Big Boss. Words of Wisdom for the benefit of humanity ought to be welcome on Wikipedia. Is Wikipedia's funding enabled by donations from all over the world? How do you reconcile this anomaly, without getting too philosophical? Ehr2VvW1Ros2 (talk) 02:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia

Wikipedia is first and foremost an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language. ”

       Jimmy Wales, March 2005

With serious constraints on the Peace Movement. Ehr2VvW1Ros2 (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic