A tag has been placed on Joe Goldman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Joe Goldman is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Joe Goldman. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. — riana_dzastawreak havoc|damage report 01:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Clements High School on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Kubigula(talk) 01:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Kukinihablame aqui 01:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Blocked You have been blocked for vandalism for 3 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.
Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukinihablame aqui 01:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
text claimed as "vandalism" was factual, but it seems that the person who blocked me felt as though the article should be biased to his/her point of view
Decline reason:
Please note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox, that we do require you attribute reliable sources (especially when making controversial claims), and that your edits appeared to be in violation of WP:BLP. Unless you can resolve these, I wouldn't feel comfortable unblocking at this time. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I would like to highlight the sort of editing that you did that was not just a viewpoint with this diff [1] that you made. Please do not add information such as this any more. Kukinihablame aqui 19:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
