User talk:Eferraren/sandbox
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Rvanarsdale in topic Rubric update
Notability
editYour subject certainly meets my standards for notability based on a quick google search. There are plenty of articles and webpages written about him by industry professionals, so your job should be easy enough. Good choice! Rvanarsdale (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Rubric update
edit| Summary: a short summary of the topic, heavily free linked to other wiki articles. | Five Points: 5 sentences, many links |
| Sections: the bulk of the article's information, cited and free linked. | One Point: One section, no links. |
| Sources: a variety of print sources. Footnotes contained in a {{reflist}}. | Three points: The reflist has ~three print or internet sources. |
| Media: a relevant picture, video, or song from the Wikimedia Commons. | Five Points: Excellent media included, captioned, and positioned. |
| Markup: Appropriate markup used. | Three Points: Adequate markup. |
The thing your article needs is a body of information, something that will make it worthwhile to read. Rvanarsdale (talk) 16:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)