GDEdits
|
Information of the International Broadcast of the new TMNT Series edit
Hi! On the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2012 TV series) you posted informations that there will be a Series Preview of the new show on german Nickelodeon on July 14th, 2012. Could you give a source for the Information? In there online shedule Nickelodeon Germany doesn't mention any Preview for July 14th.--Hudemx (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for the message :)
- I know it doesn't mention the preview in the schedule, the Nick UK site doesn't either. It's because the preview will be shown during the :new episode premiering that day (New Kung Fu Panda for UK and Spongebob's Runaway Roadtrip for Germany). Here's the promo for Germany if :you would like to watch it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuLsKpnzDUg&feature=g-all-u . And here is the UK one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSCu0b2ub2A . I hope this sorts any issues! Thanks again :)
- --User:DylanGLC2011 (Talk) 12:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Talkback edit
I specifically stated to come here, not to my talk page. Thank you. Sarujo (talk) 10:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Well okay then...
- User:DylanGLC2011 (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Message edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Disney Channel (UK and Ireland). Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 09:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oh great. It's not my problem if your ruining the page, people remove it, you ruin it again and I fix it. --DylanGLC2011 (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nickelodeon (UK & Ireland) Events edit
When I ask for an AFD of an article, that doesn't mean move the content elsewhere to avoid deletion, like you have in moving this content to List of programmes broadcast by Nickelodeon (UK & Ireland)#Upcoming Nick Programming. That cannot be done, and if deletion occurs on this article, it will be assured that the list of section (which is solely to show past and present episodes, not a TV Guide) will also be deleted as again, nothing has been addressed to improve sources and we can't use email transcripts and network PR as sources. Please follow our guidelines. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 12:22, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- So, what? You want me to add previous events? I could have done that ages ago. You couldn't have said it earlier -_- --DylanGLC2011 (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- No, no events can be added to that article, and with the deletion of the "Events" article, this section has been removed as promised. The list of programmes articles are solely to display what has aired on a network, not as an extension of what reads like something some copyeditor at Radio Times and Nickelodeon's PR office whipped up to be released on PR Newswire, and approximately 2% of channel watchers actually care about what a programme block is called; most look at the guide listing, tune in the show and don't care that it's part of some kind of themed bloc. Do not readd content like this that reads as an unfiltered advertisement. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 05:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
July 2012 edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop it, please. Your article writing is poor and overly promotional, totally bent to the entities you're writing about. You can't use Twitter and email convos with network officials, or promotional videos to source items because that is original research. You must use neutral sources like newspapers and critical sources to write about these things, and if network PR is what you have to use, it must be neutralized before it can be posted. Please learn how to write article items that do not sound like press releases and especially, TBA means 'we know nothing, don't write about this right now'. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 03:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Upcoming, again... edit
Please read our policy about conflicts of interest, immediately. Since you have clearly admitted on my talk page that you own NickUKHub, you cannot use that site as a source at all, because you clearly have an interest in driving site traffic your way by putting it in that section. With that, the section is again removed not only due to our COI policy, but we cannot source from emails from network staff to you, which again, I have touched on as original research. Please respect our policies and only use network PR and media mentions from neutral sources, not fan sources, or you will see some kind of sanction for persisting. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 04:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Also, LocateTV is ineligible as a source, as because of localization and cookies, what might look like something sourceable in your country doesn't show up where I am because it assumes I'm in the United States and don't care what's on British television. Don't use it again. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 05:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
December 2012 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sam & Cat, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. IMDb is NOT a reliable source for future show info including unaired credits - don't use it. See also WP:IMDB and WP:RS/IMDB for why. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, DylanGLC2011. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article You Gotta See This, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. You have been warned in the past not to drive traffic to your blogs, and the story isn't backed up by official network PR in the first place. Stop it. Nate • (chatter) 03:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
January 2013 edit
Stop sourcing anything to Sky's "highlights" section of their website. No neutrality is to be found in that section, and it solely exists to drive viewing and subscription traffic. I've given you many links to our policies in the past which still are on this page; please read them and utilize them. Nate • (chatter) 04:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
March 2013 edit
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 21:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 22 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam & Cat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 18 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of programmes broadcast by Nickelodeon (UK & Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swindle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, GDEdits. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)