February 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Philippine Syndicate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Syndicate groups. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Syndicate groups was changed by Dustylance45 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964972 on 2016-02-06T14:04:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Syndicate groups (Philippines), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Syndicate groups (Philippines) was changed by Dustylance45 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922005 on 2016-02-06T14:05:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Syndicate groups. Widr (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hoax articles

edit

Yes they probably are hoaxes but please leave them alone while we investigate. Repeated blanking of them makes the investigation much harder. Nthep (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply