Dstrube

International Eat a Tasty Animal for PETA Day

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article International Eat a Tasty Animal for PETA Day, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of International Eat a Tasty Animal for PETA Day

An editor has nominated International Eat a Tasty Animal for PETA Day, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Eat a Tasty Animal for PETA Day and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

International Eat a Tasty Animal for PETA Day - your comments on the talk page

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I read your comments following the nomination for deletion of this article, and thought I might help to try to explain - I am a disinterested party, so no axe to grind.

On Wikipedia, everything is meant to be done according to a community consensus. This may occur naturally as people edit articles individually into a form that conforms to something that is acceptable to everyone, or through discussions. Some of the wider ranging forms of consensus are fleshed out as "policies". These are not set in stone in that everyone can discuss and agree chanegs to them, but they cannot be ignored, because they represent the consensus of all editors.

One such policy regards notability (policy is listed here: WP:N) and this is where you will find the definition of notability in general, as well as links to notability guidelines on more specific topics. The general guideline is that the topic must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent on the subject. This means finding third-parties, such as newspapers, magazines, and even reliable webcontent (i.e. not user-generated or a wiki type system) that covers the subject of the article. A more comprehensive defintion of this is given on the page I have linked.

Another policy is that the existence of other material on Wikipedia is no reason to include a particular article (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) - it might just mean someone hasn't managed to propose it for deletion yet!

For your particular article, I would try to find independent coverage of it in a newspaper, an online piece of reliable work (see WP:RELIABLE) and include it (ideally "them") in your article. Then make a comment on the article for deletion page indicating that you want it kept, and explain that you have since introduced sources to indicate notability.

I hopen this clears up some of your questions. If I've left anything out, or if you have more questions about anything here, just reply either here or on my own talk page. Best wishes - Fritzpoll (talk) 10:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:WangHongwen.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:WangHongwen.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:YaoWenyuan.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:YaoWenyuan.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ZhangChunqiao.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ZhangChunqiao.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)