Drunkpiper
Welcome! Please have a cup of tea and let's start the talking! ;)
Catania edit
FYI, I've made some comments over on Talk:Catania#Improvement on the article FlagSteward (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ciao Drunkpiper, yes I am.Innanzitutto piacere di conoscerti.Devo ammetterlo, sono anch'io Italiano e per essere preciso Siciliano. Volendo inoltre abbondare confesso pure di essere Catanese! Tu di dove sei? Come hai chiaramente constatato le mie fonti provengono in parte da libri in mio possesso, ma altri riferimenti sono stati spulciati da biblioteche civiche e da materiale librario appartenente ad amici.Se sei d'accordo e se per te non è un problema potremmo collaborare, saremo utili a vicenda.Fammi sapere, per adesso ti saluto, non vorrei che WP decidesse di cacciarmi visto che sto digitando spudoratamente in Italiano.A presto.--Caul Donnalba (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Allora Drunkpiper, mi fa piacere "ca macari tu si catanisi".Riguardo al mio nick è un anagramma.La collaborazione non deve essere uno stress, del resto mica ci pagano.Nuddu nnassicuta.Quando avremo voglia, tempo e materiale da inserire lasceremo le nostre piccole tracce.Del resto nnamu appriari sulu rô fattu ca semu i ddu suli catanisi "macca liofanti" che scribacchiano nella Wikipedia inglese.Non credi? E poi perchè dovremmo lasciarlo fare solo agli stranieri, per quanto acculturati e presumibilmente molto più preparati e forbiti.Mi chiedevi, inoltre se per caso collaboro con la Wikipedia italiana.Al momento no. Più avanti... forse. Vedremo...Per ora mi trovo bene a strimpellare in English, del resto nella pagina italiana di Catania hanno già scritto "quasi" tutto.Sembrano abbastanza agguerriti, lavorano bene. Qui mi scialo, nella mia tranquillità inserisco qualche aggiunta, sperando che il mio inglese sia sempre sufficientemente comprensibile e corretto.Faccio, anzi.... facciamo pura e semplice promozione turistica (aggratis per essere più precisi).Satisfied? Further questions? Ciao, nni sintemu.--Caul Donnalba (talk) 21:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just a note to begin: Don't know where people complained if one here speaks not in English, so I will also do. As for those small images, I think those people have their images in their dedicated articles, so here, being an encyclopedia (differently from what can be a magazine article where it can be helpful to give some image context) in articles just mentioning people (apart some cases, say, "Leonardo art" you can add an images of him too) there's no need to add their faces. This also in order not to make articles an unreadable bunch of images.
- Una nota: dopo i segni di punteggiatura ci va lo spazio ;)
Ciao e a presto!!
- Ciao! Rieccomi! Allora, le immagini anzitutto dovrebbero più o meno avere le stesse dimensioni, specie se vicine. Altrimenti viene una schifezza. Riguardo l'opportunità di inserire le facce dei due personaggi, per quanto importanti, personalmente non mi sembra il caso. Visto che nella maggior parte degli articoli di Wikipedia non vengono aggiunte, penso che bisogna fare così. Però è una mia opinione. Fammi sapere e buon lavoro! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paninaro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burlington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Drunkpiper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Etna Comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alessandro Borghi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)