Drestros power's Talk Page

edit

Vandalism by 207.193.126.66

edit

Topic Gastric bypass surgery was also vandalized by 207.193.126.66. Re your last warning posted at 1507 15 May, this appears to be widespread vandalism, possibly by multiple users at this IP. Their edit list shows a wide variety of edits. I suggest that this site be blocked from editing any topic. Topnife 18:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Radio Free Virgin

edit

You undid a change we made to the Radio Free Virgin page. I am with Virgin,please leave it as modified today. Thank you.

Oceanic crust

edit

On 29 March 2007 someone using your account vandalized the Oceanic crust article. They provided the edit summary: "Edited out vandism." while adding the following text: "Erika has no life. Because she is lame.k.bye" Warning: if you cannot control the usage of your account, please disable it.

 
This may be the only warning you will receive. Vandalism will not be tolerated. Vandals will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bejnar 20:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • My apologies. It appears from your list of contributions that you are working hard to eliminate vandalism from the Wikipedia. It must have been a slip of your keyboard that regenerated the prior vandalism in the Oceanic crust article. --Bejnar 21:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Iam sorry if someone has valdialised useing my account, if I did undo vandilsm after someone has changed it I did not mean to, Iam sorry. --Drestros power 18:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Drestros powerReply

I have just looked at the "vandilsm" that I have done and whent back a few edits and found this: The Real Vandilsm

High School Musical songs.

edit

Hey. I've reverted your reversion to the article We're All in This Together, based on a AfD discussion. The songs aren't notable, they never will be. Will (I hope they cannot see, I AM THE GREAT DESTROYER!) 21:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks for reverteing my reverting, Iam sorry for this mistake and please feal free to revert any mistakes I have.Drestros power 21:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Drestros powerReply

It's okay, I don't blame you. Good work on the non-mistakes :) Will (I hope they cannot see, I AM THE GREAT DESTROYER!) 21:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!

edit

Thank you for reverting my page! What that person said honestly offended me. So thanks again. - LooneyGeoffrey

No problem, sorry that someone vandalized there. Drestros power 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Drestros powerReply

Rostrevor College

edit

Please go back a few edits, they'res heaps of recent garbage there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 121.45.176.106 (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Please look carefully i'm just trying to get an administrators attention, the real vandalism is throughout the Rostrevor College article and needs to be reverted. 121.45.176.106 13:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Resolved – Gurch 19:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nelson Mandela

edit

Thanks for catching my mistake. It appears I reverted to a still-vandalized version. However, now I can't find any version that matches what I reverted to; I'm starting to suspect it was some kind of weird edit-conflict thing, where the IP and I saved at about the same time?

Anyway, good catch. --barneca (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re:Vandalism on userpage

edit

I have actually taken the step of semi-protecting my userpage to stop the vandalism. Thanks for the advice. --Daysleeper47 19:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why undoing this?

edit

Hi, I've seen that you reverted my deletion of content in Talk:Latin Kings and my new entry there, and I wanted to ask you why... I deleted a rant that didn't add anything at all to the discussion, if you think it should stay I'd like to know your point of view. And why erasing my remark about the internationalization of the article? Thanks! Davidsevilla | Talk 18:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cookies

edit
 
Cookies!

Hello, Drestros power. I just wanted to give you a plate of cookies for being a Wikipedian. I hope your Wikistress gets better! Peace, Neranei 01:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply