Dreston

Welcome!

Hello, Dreston, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Robert J. Costa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WWGB (talk) 03:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert J. Costa

A tag has been placed on Robert J. Costa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WWGB (talk) 03:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Robert J. Costa

(edit conflict) I wanted to advise you of a couple Wikipedia policies that apply to your recently-created article.

First of all, I notice that the text is strikingly similar to this (which you referenced). We require attribution for direct quotations, for copyright reasons—but in a case such as this, it would make far more sense to just rephrase it in your own words, because it's bad form to use a block of copyrighted text to comprise the entire body of an article. (If this isn't changed quickly, it will be necessary to flag this article for copyright violation—speedy deletion is a probable outcome, in that case.)

Next, with regard to the subject of the article, Robert J. Costa, we need to see independent evidence of notability. That generally means that the article subject has received prominent and substantial coverage in media or scholarship. We have to refer to reliable sources in order to allow for verifiability—original research is not permitted. In this case, the Amazon review is not a sufficiently reliable source. The other source ([1]) doesn't cover Costa as a major subject—it just mentions him by way of his book, once. (Again, without evidence of notability, deletion is probable.)

And also, if Costa is currently alive, the biographies of living persons policy applies.

For style and formatting information, see the welcome message above. See also WP:WPBIO for information on writing biographical articles.

If you can't improve the article, and it does end up getting deleted, consider starting anew in user space, and moving it once you've found and inserted further well-referenced information. (Any administrator can provide you with a copy of the deleted article, if you want it.) TheFeds 03:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Stop removing template

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Robert J. Costa. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 03:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Survey

Hi Dreston!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 06:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Dreston! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Dreston! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)