childbirth article

edit

Your edit was a good one but it was not a minor grammar edit. Be more careful about your wording. (some editors do that as a way to be dishonest) Even still, nice work! Sectionworker (talk) 23:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Great improvement of your own edit. Sometimes I feel that a brand new editor's edit needs improvement but resist jumping right in to show them how they aren't good enough... I may go back to it after a few weeks. Though many times I also improve my own writing as you just did. I hope that you continue to work on WP to improve our encyclopedia. Sectionworker (talk) 04:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Addition of images

edit

I notice that you have been adding a number of images to articles. In general, that is fine, provided that the image contributes to the encyclopaedic value of the article and is positioned within the article to illustrate a relevant point. I have had to undo your addition of an image to Photography as it was right at the top in the lede and it was not of encyclopaedic value. Other additions include an image at Cricket flour where the placement has shifted the table of contents off to the left in the desktop view and left a very ugly arrangement. Please only add images where they make a real improvement to the understanding of the topic and is a significant enhancement to the article. Thank you  Velella  Velella Talk   01:06, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Okay, sorry. I'll stop adding images. Dree Crystal (talk) 16:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


Dree Crystal (talk) 17:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
GeneralNotability (talk) 22:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit

There are multiple blocks against your account and/or IP address Dree Crystal Talk   02:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dree Crystal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I never wanted to do anything bad. I just didn't know the right way to edit. I promise I'll stop adding images and only edit small simple things so I don't make a mistake. If you notice me do anything wrong, I promise you are free to block me again. The only reason I made other accounts is because I didn't know why I was blocked and thought I could make other accounts to do edits, but each of them got blocked. I wondered "why do they think I should be blocked?" All I wanted to do was build the encyclopedia. But I felt like people didn't think I was good enough to do edits just because I'm new. Dree Crystal (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is a checkuser block. You need to appeal your block on your original account. Meters (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Did you know this is the first account I ever made on Wikipedia? @Meters Dree Crystal (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

That's not what the check users say. I'm not a checkuser but I seem to remember thinking that you were associated with User:Aarist Fire, user:Yums and, and user:Hoodymo. Meters (talk) 06:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
They are related to me, but they are not my accounts. I had first joined Wikipedia after them. Also, knowing Aarist Fire in person, I know Aarist fire and Hoodymo are the same people. He just made 2 accounts. The other account that I made was User:Rainbow rollerblader. Dree Crystal (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Actually I also have 2 other accounts besides Rainbow rollerblader: User:Indefinitely popped and Indefinitely topped with a cherry. Other accounts by Aarist Fire include User:Aaron$richy. Dree Crystal (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
You know what, I don't mind being blocked. If people think I did something wrong, then I did do something wrong. I will be patient and see if anyone'll side with me. Dree Crystal (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply