February 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ryu Hyun-woo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean Mone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 04:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Edward S. Barrows House with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeairn (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Excretion. Meters (talk) 04:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply



Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

It seems that you are/were operating the following account(s):

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Thomas Boot Resurrected (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of Dr. Thomas Boot

Decline reason:

Declined per the discussion below, and your apparent unwillingness to explain the vandalism and make positive contributions instead. — Earwig talk 05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not a sock puppet of who? Which user? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

His account name is Dr. Thomas Boot and I have nothing to do with him.


Oh, I see. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr. Thomas Boot. You obviously are.


I have revoked your talk page access. If you wish to appeal this block, first read Wikipedia:Appealing a block, then visit the unblock requests system (UTRS). Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply