Welcome! edit

Hello, Dr.Pietroczar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Harold Godwinson. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Anti-Defamation League. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhDv2.0 01:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Complaint department edit

If you want to whine about how i corrected/removed/rephrased your article, do it here. If you have a legitimate complaint, make a new thread Dr.Pietroczar (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ragamuffin War. Jim1138 (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

You need to add the citation with your edit edit

The wp:BURDEN is on you. Per wp:V unsourced content may be removed. See help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes Jim1138 (talk) 01:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

      I have a source ready to use https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ragamuffin  is this an acceptable source and if so, what format is best?


  Cited my source

Persistent disruption edit

Here you go again wasting other editor's time with unhelpful original research. Time to say goodbye to your account? --Epipelagic (talk) 08:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

hmm... that's odd, considering it is cited and included in the current version of the page... what a strange coincidence.

in hindsight the sarcasm in that statement may have been a bit unwarrented, sorry dude

Yes indeed, the admins we are lumbered with have blessed you from their high perch and are not going to interfere with your disruption. There's nothing powerless content builder can do to impede you, so you are free to carry on tearing down our work. --Epipelagic (talk) 07:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
wow... real mature, considering i have a source and no admin has said anything. grow up and stop harassing me because i'm new Dr.Pietroczar (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Awaken Reloaded has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply