Edit warring edit

Regarding this edit [1], I would recommend initiating a discussion on the article's talk page instead of continued edit warring. Your edit is completely unsourced, and anything unsourced can be immediately reverted for any reason. That means if you revert again unilaterally, you run the risk of being blocked. Make your case that the song is about environmentalism if you want your edit to stand. Continued edit warring will just get you banned, so the choice is yours. SolarFlashDiscussion 19:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


This edit [2] was reverted because your source states that the song is about ecology. Ecology is the relationship between organisms and their environment. That's clearly separate from environmentalism. Again, you can initiate a discussion to see if you can gain a consensus to allow your edit to stand. SolarFlashDiscussion 19:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


This is in the hopes that you'll stop the edit warring before it's too late. Regarding this edit [3], the guidelines are clear that only a maximum of four genres are to be listed in an infobox, and no genre should be listed if it isn't reliably sourced within the prose. I can assure you that edit warring over something that contrdicts the guidelines is a bad idea. You can familiarize yourself with the rules or you can continue to edit war and get banned. Your choice. And watch the personal attacks. SolarFlashDiscussion 00:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm SolarFlash. Your recent edit(s) to the page Man on the Silver Mountain appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SolarFlashDiscussion 19:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply