Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Dmfennell, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's Manual of Style

The Manual of Style (abbreviated as MoS or MOS) is the style guide for all Wikipedia articles. Its goal is to make using Wikipedia easier and more intuitive by promoting clarity and cohesion. Style and formatting should be consistent within an article based on the MOS.

The shortcut to the main MOS guideline page is WP:MOS. To add the MOS template to your user or talk page, place {{style}} on there.

Any suggestions for improvement or changes to the MOS guideline begins with discussion and consensus at the MOS talk page.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Merger discussion for Pole sports

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing—Pole sports—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm WikiLinuz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Obsessive–compulsive disorder have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --WikiLinuz (talk) 03:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I am a professor who does research on OCD and added some diverse sources, including peer-reviewed research studies I did or that I found about topics like herbs I didn't see covered in the article (researchers with whom I have no affiliation). It looks like the sources I added were removed, including peer-reviewed research studies I looked up on topics not covered currently in the article. That seems problematic as it reinforces particular views on OCD and its treatment. Dmfennell (talk) 03:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply