July 2018

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipjadeja (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here This not a sock puppet

Decline reason:

It appears you've been busy making a large number of null edits to scam your way past extended protection put in place to prevent a large number of POV socks from editing a controversial article. Kuru (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Administrator

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipjadeja (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

not a sock puppet, first someone blocked me by saying that I was a sock of some Shantanu and now the block is saying some Kiranmayi, I am neither a sock nor a puppet of anyone Dilipjadeja (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kiranmayi_pal. Yamla (talk) 13:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As clearly noted, please do not remove declined unblock messages. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipjadeja (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't even know whoz Kiranmoyi, I am not a sock puppet Dilipjadeja (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The evidence contradicts this. Max Semenik (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dilipjadeja (talk)