Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/County Route 621 (Sussex County, New Jersey) was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago Public Schools. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zagalejo^^^ 03:47, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kris Humphries, you may be blocked from editing. GcSwRhIc (talk) 22:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. You have a new message at GcSwRhIc's talk page. GcSwRhIc (talk) 22:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your edits

edit

Please stop inserting unsourced materials to articles. If you continue, I will have to report you.—Chris!c/t 22:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet accusation

edit

Please stop making baseless sockpuppet accusation against editors who reverted you. The reason your edits are reverted is because they are vandalism or they are unsourced.—Chris!c/t 23:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

When you keep accusing others as sockpuppet with nothing to back it up, then it is baseless. Also I never say every one of your edits are vandalism, but most are not sourced and many are downright unhelpful. Lastly, try report me and see what happens. Any reasonable admin will notice that you are only here to cause disruption and not here to build an encyclopedia.—Chris!c/t 23:41, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
You kidding me? Your edit to Chris Paul is clearly unhelpful. Saying that "he was awesome" is simply your opinion and is not supported by any source. And your editing summary is not accurate either. This so called "information" is not "removed against community consensus."—Chris!c/t 00:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Go ahead. Fact is majority of your edits are unhelpful.—Chris!c/t 00:54, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

edit

I was wondering if someone would unblock me. I promise to stop vandalizing Wikipedia if unblocked. Could someone also unblock my secondary accounts?

You can use Template:Unblock to get another admin's attention. I still really think you're better off just starting a new account and staying out of trouble with that account though. To any admin who sees this: You don't have to contact me about your decision. Grandmasterka 06:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply