Ralph Cowan

edit

I noticed your additions to the article on Ralph Cowan. You made some pretty ambitious claims for this article. For any statements like these which some could claim to be biased, you need to provide verifiable and reputable references. Please see WP:BIO for guidelines on editing biographies. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 00:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

As long as your edits are from a reputable source then they are OK, but you should specify where you got them from. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources on the correct way to do so. If they aren't referenced there is no way to verify them unless someone has read the books you mantioned. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Judy LaMarsh

edit

I reverted your edits to Judy LaMarsh for the same reasons as above. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 01:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I second EncyclopediaUpdaticus's assessment. I found, with little trouble using the Toronto Public Library's online services, several articles on Miss LaMarsh. Including one that clearly shows she never was offered a Senate appointment. Since you seem to be affiliated with the University of Toronto, please use the resources they give you, such as e-Library, and the resource for checking the Toronto Star and The Globe and Mail can be found using the ProQuest database, that is free at either the TPL or UofT.Abebenjoe (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

J.S. Woodworth

edit

It's impossible to follow all articles. I follow Ontario politicians based in Toronto which was why I saw your edit to Ralph Cowan. I then followed your "user contributions" which is how I found similar edits to J.S Woodworth and Judy LaMarsh. If you do the same for my user contributions you will see that I am always careful to provide references for my new additions. All editors should strive to be this meticulous, including yourself. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply