Desk Jockey
Re: Norwich edit
Hi I intended to link it with other Vermont Colleges. Sorry if I messed up. CApitol3
Re: Norwich edit
Believed I was adding links to other Vermont Colleges on page bottom. CApitol3
Because Norwich University is a part of Vermont's higher education landscape. CApitol3
No, all it does, I think, is add the links across the bottom.CApitol3
Yes, I may have used the wrong terminology with the word "stub". Just trying to show Vermont higher education links. You mention you don't believe that is what I am trying to do. I can't imagine what else placing it there could do. If this is troubling you please feel free to delete and I will not revert to the Vermont higher education link. Or, if you are unfamiliar with editing drop me a line and I can delete it for you. CApitol3 13:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Jackman hall in winter.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Jackman hall in winter.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Norwich Assembly.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Norwich Assembly.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Chaplin_doors.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Chaplin_doors.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Klibrary_interior.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Klibrary_interior.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Webbsteps.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Webbsteps.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Norwich edit
On April 7, 2:41, you said - after deleting three sections: "Stop copying from the University's website. Rewrite, draw inspiration from but do not copy. It's in extremely poor taste. Thank you."
Before I begin, it should be noted that I was happy to see you do some clean up on the Alumni Re-configuration and additions I made. I thank you. While I have rarely, actually never questioned your edits, I find many flaws in your reasoning for the deletion of three criticle inserts on the Norwich University Page. It shoud
First, with the "Norwich University's Legacy" section that you deleted with one click. Norwich University not only has a long history, but has been at the front of social change. Prior to this insert, there was no information on allowing African Americans in the Corps, accepting International Students, etc. Just because you do not deem them important, does not mean that are not.
Second, First Theta Chi Fraternity Chapter, this is a national Fraternity with thousans of members and alumni - the fact that it was founded at Norwich is an historic event. So much so it is on the Theta Chi web-page.
Third, with the Student Organizations, if you look at EVERY other University/College, they list their largest and most influential student organizations. From George Washington University to Harvard to UCLA - Norwich also has large and influential student organizations. I hope you will look and follow the precedent that other University/College pages have already set.
In regards to your last comment of "copying fromt he University's website. I did not copy and past, I took the facts and names and wrote them into my own words. However, the information is correct. UNFORTUNETLY, my taste has no place in Wikipedia, nor does yours. We are not allowed to draw insperation and embelish things and only put information in "good taste." That is a violation of Wikipedia rules, what we are encouraged to do is to state facts - From Real Resources Like The University's Web-Site & Archives. Again, do not take my word for it, I hope you will both review the precedent other University and College pages have set as well as the Wikipedia guidlines.
I hope this clarifyed this issue. I hope we continue to work on this page togeather.
68.55.109.227 03:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Julianne Moore edit
Well played eh? I don't care if she calls me a liar. This is the link to where I found the listing. The person who posted the listing on imdb should be the one to blame, not me. Thanks for the insult, but you should look for the culprit there. That's where I got the information, and they made the error. --Candy156sweet (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Apology accepted. I have to admit that did hurt my feelings a bit. Maybe you should write to NBC and complain about the error. LOL! Take care and have a lovely weekend. --Candy156sweet (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh and I have to ask this... What did she exactly say? I would love to know. --Candy156sweet (talk) 05:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)