Dennyg2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dennyg2007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What the heck are you talking about? I merely kept the One Bid page from becoming property of a Golden Road idiot who thinks he owns Wiki. And to accuse me of being a IP vandal, what the heck are you talking about? Show me where I admitted such, thank you, because it doesn't exist. I have a good edit history and there is no reason for a block.

Decline reason:

Edits like this,[1] along with you general pattern and conflicts seem to indicate the sockpuppet allegations are likely. Additionally, rude and demanding unblocked "requests" will not result in an unblock. — Vassyana (talk) 21:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok, I'd like to take it to Arbcom, but you have the email disabled. How fair is that?

ArbCom has a public email address (see WP:ARBCOM). On-wiki email does not affect the contact of ArbCom via email in any way. Vassyana (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/User:Hdayejr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 17:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)