User talk:Denevedr/sandbox
I believe that everything in the article was related to the topic and it was easy to follow. It was very neutral. All of the source links worked and I they all seem like credible sources. I have very little knowledge on this subject, but I was able to follow the article. Great job! Abbysmith561 (talk) 15:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
peer review edit
There are two periods at the end of the last sentence in the intro. Other than that it looks great Jadeizaguirre (talk) 14:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
Overall, this seems like a great article! The only things I might change would be to combine the References, Bibliography, and External Links sections into one; they should all be accomplishing pretty much the same thing. Additionally, I might move the Schrödinger equation stuff from the intro paragraph to the Wave function section, since the two are related. You could then focus on a little more background stuff for the intro section. Other than these, the article seemed perfect!Elderjm2 (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)