{{helpme}} This question is in reference to the attached user page, which is being developed for inclusion into the article namespace. The page is actually a hybrid of a disambiguation page and an article page. As a disambiguation page it provides links to various articles that use the RADB acronym. As an article page it provides a list of various uses of the Acronym RADB. So my question is how should it be set up?
Should the links, which serve as reference links in cases that there are no associated Wikipedia pages be deleted or moved to a Reference or Also see section. Should the "unexpanded definition be left as a broken (missing) link Should a short expanded definition be included ie:
- Radioactive D'Bazzar - A Showcase (bazaar) of the work of young designers in the retail industry.
Being new to Wikipedia, I am still having difficulty in searching for answers to these kinds of questions. Dbiel 03:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, if it is notable. Please see the disambig. policy. Cheers! Real96 03:09, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}} Would it be better to include the following link for entries that are not considered notable?
- Please see the List of acronyms and initilisms for additional uses of the term RADB
Just as a note; I was unaware of that listing until just now.
I will be editing that page to include RADB latter today.
Or would the following alternate wording be better?
- RADB - link to the List of acronyms and initilisms
Dbiel 23:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Just list them all if it's a disambiguation. See Wikipedia:Disambiguation. John Reaves (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)