Danwhitcongress

June 2021

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to 2022 United States Senate election in Arkansas. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Bass77_talkcontribs 00:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello. My name is Dan Whitfield. I am the person listed on the page. What does my not making the ballot as an independent in 2020 have to do with a 20// campaign? I will continue to remove the irrelevant information. If you have a problem have your supervisor email me at dan@danforarkansas.com thanks. Danwhitcongress (talk) 01:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Again, have you read WP:CENSOR. I know you're trying to make yourself look better, but please stop edit warring. SHB2000 (talk) 01:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at 2022 United States Senate election in Arkansas, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. SHB2000 (talk) 01:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Removing irrelevant information is not censoring. I’m removing Wikipedia from all of my social media links and will never again send traffic to your site. I will contact my attorney in the morning and have him write up a cease and desist letter. Danwhitcongress (talk) 01:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Yeah.. ok Donald Trump. Danwhitcongress (talk) 02:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danwhitcongress (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have now read the entire terms and service. I apologize for being ignorant in the policy rules and did not mean to violate them. I’m sorry for my frustration in response and will not break terms again. It can get frustrating being a candidate dealing with people, but I must be more patient and always follow guidelines.

Decline reason:

Legal threat is still outstanding. Yamla (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.